Duchess and Bruno in prehistoric cave-dweller outfits grip their spear and freeze in fear as a menacing tiger blocks the entrance to their cave

Can an Argument with Fallacies Still Have a True Conclusion?

Yes - and this is the most interesting and often overlooked thing about fallacies. Spotting a fallacy in someone's argument does not mean their conclusion is wrong. It means their argument hasn't proven it yet. Those are two very different things.

When the Hasty Judgment Turns Out to Be Right

Take the Hasty Generalisation. The fallacy is built on the idea that jumping to a conclusion from insufficient evidence is flawed reasoning - and it usually is. But sometimes that hasty judgment is exactly right.

Duchess and Bruno dressed as prehistoric cave dwellers peer nervously from their cave at a prowling tiger outside — illustrating how a hasty generalisation can sometimes lead to a completely correct conclusion, even if the reasoning itself was technically flawed

If you hear a rustle in the bushes and your instinct says danger, that's a hasty generalisation. You have no real evidence. But if there's a tiger on the other side, your conclusion was correct - even if your reasoning process was technically flawed.

Dismissing the instinct by saying "I'm just committing a fallacy" could put you in a far worse position than acting on it. The fallacy tells you the argument is weak. It doesn't tell you the conclusion is false.

Or what about a leader who uses an Appeal to Emotion to argue for better hospital funding - he or she might be doing the right thing even though they're using a fallacy. The fallacy tells us nothing about whether what they're proposing is good or not.

Not All Fallacies are False

This means that even though an argument contains a fallacy, it doesn't always mean the conclusion is wrong. So rather than saying "That's a fallacy, therefore you're wrong," it's better to say "Your argument doesn't support your conclusion - can you come up with a better one?"

That single shift changes everything. You're not dismissing the conclusion. You're asking for it to be properly supported. If the conclusion is true, better evidence should exist. If it isn't, the challenge to produce it will reveal that quickly enough.

Fallacy Spotting is Just the Beginning

This is what separates fallacy spotting as a debating weapon from fallacy spotting as a genuine tool for finding the truth. Ultimately, recognising fallacies is the very beginning of critical thinking. Once you can spot them, your task is to determine whether they're leading to conclusions that are true or not.

New to fallacies? Start with What Is a Logical Fallacy? for the basics.

See all the fallacies worth knowing in What Are the Most Common Logical Fallacies?

Back to blog

Leave a comment

    1 out of ...