Duchess the cat holds a ruler and eyes Bruno's phone skeptically as he thrusts it in her face showing an image of the Earth in space, illustrating how a cognitive bias

Cognitive Bias vs Logical Fallacy: What's the Difference?

It's super easy to confuse logical fallacies with cognitive biases because they can sometimes overlap, such as the anecdotal fallacy sounds similar to the anecdotal bias.

What's the Difference? 

A good way to distinguish each one is:

  • A logical fallacy is a flaw in something we say
  • A cognitive bias influences how we see things (not really a flaw - more a lens)

To dive deeper, logical fallacies are errors in reasoning. We say something that is flawed, not logical: "We can't trust that guy's opinion because he's a bad person." That's an ad hominem attack. We're attacking the person, not their argument.

A group of cartoon animals debate around a table with microphones and notepads — illustrating how logical fallacies show up in what we say out loud, making them far easier to spot and challenge than the hidden cognitive biases driving them

Whereas cognitive biases work at a much deeper level, literally. They shape how we see things before we even have time to think anything. For example, with confirmation bias, our brain filters what information we see or take notice of. We don't even realise that it is framing what we pay attention to.

A cartoon beagle sits alone in a dark room scrolling through a social media post showing other animals at a party — illustrating how the bandwagon instinct (cognitive bias) quietly drives the Bandwagon Effect fallacy

How do they work together?

Cognitive biases are the driver of logical fallacies.

  • Confirmation bias drives the anecdotal fallacy - you see what you want to see and then select evidence to support your point of view
  • The bandwagon instinct drives the bandwagon effect - we are deeply wired to follow the herd and that wiring is what makes us jump on the bandwagon
  • The sunk cost bias drives the sunk cost fallacy - we really don't like losing so we double down

In a nutshell, we don't really know our cognitive biases (unless we become conscious of them) but we can have our logical fallacies pointed out to us because they're something we've said. 

This is why teaching logical fallacies is better than teaching biases. It is much easier to point to a flaw in something you're friend has said than to point to the biases that shape how they see the world.

Duchess the cat eyes Bruno the beagle skeptically as he holds up a phone showing a globe — illustrating how cognitive biases shape the lens through which we see the world, while logical fallacies are the flawed arguments we make out loud

If you're friend is making a bad argument, you are dealing with a fallacy. If they don't want to listen to a good argument, no matter what way you present it to them, you are probably dealing with a bias.

Quick note: Cognitive biases are not bad. They help protect us. If we didn't have them, we wouldn't survive in the real-world. That rustle behind the bushes just might be a predator (confirmation bias). There's just too much information for our brains to process all at once, so a bias to being safe rather than sorry can save your life.

Want to learn the most common fallacies? Read our What Are the Most Common Logical Fallacies? article.

Curious how fallacies show up in everyday manipulation? See Why Should I Learn Logical Fallacies? for a deeper look.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

    1 out of ...